Tag Archives: Crime and Deviance

Tory cuts – more sink housing estates – rising crime?

This podcast provides Some basic left wing analysis of the likely effects of the recent Tory Benefit cuts – from the web site –

‘The changes to housing benefit include a 10% cut for those out of work for more than a year and an overall cap of £250 a week for a one-bedroom property, rising to £400 a week for a four-bedroom or larger home.Critics say the coalition’s housing benefit cuts will displace 200,000 people from Britain’s major metropolitan areas, ghettoising the poor.’

This is potentially relevant to the A2 module in Crime and Deviance

This effect will of course be generalised across other regions – rich and poor neighbourhoods will become ever more polarised – so on the one hand we see here a likely intensification of ‘sink housing estates’ that, according to both and Right and Left Realist criminology, create the conditions for crime and on the other hand we should also see a longer term increase in gated high security communities – maybe even the emergence of Bauman’s ‘Fortress Cities’ – as those that can afford it strive to protect themselves from the dangerous poor, desperate people living in ghettos.

Thanks Giddeon!

Interestingly in John Heale’s book one blood he argues that most of the of the present gang crime problem emerged in inner city ghettos that were cuased by Thatcher’s neo – liberal policies of the 1980s causing greater inequalities.

The Home Office’s take on why black people are seven times more likely to end up in jail than white people

A recent home office report looks into the overpresentation of young black people in the criminal justice system – OK so ethnicity and crime is only about 1/20th of the module – and this is only about black people – so let’s call this a ‘stretch and challenge’ activity. You could maybe browse through this if you have the time…  I just wish I’d stumbled accross this a couple of years ago – why the people who write the damned text books don’t spend more time surfing the net to update the material I don’t know – oh yes I do – it’s because they’re interested in the money rather than the subject.

Two things the report notes about ‘the nature and extent of overpresentation’ are

  • There are big variations in overrepresentation within teh category ‘black’
  • There are data gaps that prevent us from getting a full picture of the extent of overpresentation

The report says the following about the causes of overrepresentation  – there are multiple and complex causes!

  • Educational underachievement is a symptom and cause of disadvantage
  • Educational underachievement and disaffection is accompanied by high levels of school exclusion among black young people
  • Deprivation and underachievement mean young black people lack positive role models to which to aspire
    Other issues within black communities compound disadvantage
  • Young black people’s distinctive reaction to disadvantage also causes involvement in crime
    Criminal Justice System factors play a direct and indirect role in promoting overrepresentation
  • Young black people who have offended are more likely to come into contact with the system
  • In some instances, discrimination contributes directly to overrepresentation
  • The perception, as well as the reality, of discrimination promotes involvement with the criminal justice system

A fuller summary of the report –

It is important to place young black people’s overrepresentation in perspective: in 84.7% of offences in 2004-05 involving young offenders aged 10-17, the young people involved classified their ethnicity as white. In 2003-04, 92% of black young people aged 10-17 were not subject to disposals in the youth justice system. However, statistics show that young black people are overrepresented at all stages of the criminal justice system. Black people constitute 2.7% of the population aged 10-17, but represent 8.5% of those of that age group arrested in England and Wales. As a group, they are more likely to be stopped and searched by the police, less likely to be given unconditional bail and more likely to be remanded in custody than white young offenders. Young black people and those of ‘mixed’ ethnicity are likely to receive more punitive sentences than young white people.

Data gaps prevent us from building a comprehensive picture of young black people’s overrepresentation in the criminal justice system. However, the evidence we received suggests young black people are overrepresented as suspects for certain crimes such as robbery, drugs offences and—in some areas—firearms offences. Young black people are also more likely to be victims of violent crimes. There are variations in the overrepresentation of different groups within the ‘black’ category, and between females and males. We can say with greater certainty that the patterns of offending vary between different ethnic groups than that the level of offending varies significantly.

Some of our witnesses were concerned that the media distorts perceptions of young black people’s involvement in crime. Research commissioned by this Committee contradicted this view, indicating that most members of the public reject stereotyping as regards young black people’s involvement in crime.

Social exclusion is a key underlying cause of overrepresentation. Eighty per cent of Black African and Black Caribbean communities live in Neighbourhood Renewal Fund areas. Deprivation directly fuels involvement in some types of offence—such as acquisitive crime—and also has an important impact on educational achievement and the profile of the neighbourhood young people will live in. The level of school exclusions appears to be directly related to educational underachievement and both are linked to involvement in the criminal justice system.

Witnesses also emphasised factors within black communities which help exacerbate disadvantage and fuel involvement in the criminal justice system. They drew attention to a lack of father involvement and to other parenting issues. In the perceived absence of alternative routes to success, some young people also actively choose to emulate negative and violent lifestyles popularised in music and film.

Criminal justice system factors play an important role in promoting overrepresentation. There is some evidence to support allegations of direct or indirect discrimination in policing and the youth justice system. However, the perception as well as the reality of discrimination has an impact. Lack of confidence in the criminal justice system may mean some young black people take the law into their own hands or carry weapons in an attempt to distribute justice and ensure their own personal safety.

A coherent strategy to address the overrepresentation of young black people in the criminal justice system is needed to draw together departments’ responses and set challenging goals to reduce overrepresentation. Within this strategy, further action is needed to address the causes of crime among young black people—entrenched poverty, educational underachievement, school exclusions, family conflict and breakdown and lack of positive role models. Some of this support will be aimed at all young black people and some should target specific at-risk groups, such as prison leavers. Finally, further action is needed to address both the realities and perceptions of criminal justice system discrimination and ensure the system meets young black peoples’ needs

sociopops – the rong radio station by Benjamin Zephaniah

My ears are battered and burned and

I have just learned that I have been

listening to the wrong radio station…

Clever song and vid too – listen/ watch it and think about the questions below…
 

1. guess what’s in the package. 2 guess what the hell those two strange guys in masks are all about, 3..The newspapers not the Sun but the S…, and 4. What is the ‘rong radio station’?

Roughly 50% of the themes that arise in the crime and deviance module arise in this song….!

My fave line – ”I needed to know what some pop star some where was having for breakfast.”

It’s worth checking out Zephaniah’s web site too

It’s just a shame he doesn’t like people like me very much – he’s that anti-establishment!

If you read this BZ I promise I’ll teach at least one lesson at some point in the future where I just tell the kids to F off and do their own thing, in your honour.

Web site of the Week – The Centre for Crime and Justice Studies

The Centre for Crime and Justice Studies is an excellent site for keeping up to date with Criminological research – They say of themselves ‘Our mission is to promote just and effective responses to crime and related harms by informing and educating through critical analysis, research and public debate.’

You can subscribe to a monthly bulletin and they do a number of critical reseach papers.

To give you an idea of their kind of approach a few years back they ran a photography competition – exploring the question ‘what is crime’ through photography. The results can be viewed by clicking here

My particular favourite is the entry below – which struck a chord because I’ve been reading a lot about gang crime and media coverage of gang crime recently.

1193_181503s‘gemma’ – By Laura Pannack. ‘Society has a tendency to enforce blame on the younger generation for crime and violence. These negative stereo-types encourage further rebellion and prevent young people from gaining self confidence and aspiration; they fuel a lack of self worth and anger. I have intentionally left it unclear whether my subjects are offenders on probation, pupils with special needs, private school attendants or other young people I have encountered. Titled with the forename of each young person, gives the viewer a hint as to their identity without attaching stigma ? and emphasising the fact that each of my subjects is unique.’

Work is more violent than the streets!

According to Professor Steve Tombs anyway – in this report where he compares the costs of work based crime (deaths and injury caused by breaches of Health and Safety law) with the costs of street crime

http://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/opus685/crisisenforcementweb.pdf

Although such comparisons can only be broadly

indicative, they do lead us to the rather undeniable

conclusion – that work is much more likely to be a

source of violence in Britain than those ‘real’ crimes

recorded by the Home Offi ce.

 

Thinking Allowed – White Collar Crime

The link below will take you to the ‘Thinking Allowed’ archive for Crime and Deviance – if you scroll down you will find three programmes on ‘White Collar Crime’ – The programmes look at the culture, practice and prosecution of white collar crime, with Laurie speaking to leading academic experts and professionals on both sides of the law.

A summary of these three programmes can be found at 

(see http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/factual/thinkingallowed/thinkingallowed_crime_deviancy.shtml) says:

You should listen to these programmes for yourselves. Some of the key findings are as follows –

 

Point 1 – Evidence that Corporate Crime is harmful

Criminologist Garry Slapper, argues that Corporate and white collar crime cause considerable harm

Some dreadful deaths happen as a result of corporate negligence – Workers have been buried alive, eloctocuted, fallen into vats of chemicals. However,  breaches of health and safety law are often considered to be ‘not really crime’ (Croal). Those who commit the corporate crimes which maim and kill are hidden from view.

Steph Tombs and Dave White – criticise the lack of moral compulsion. Base line figure – HS executive – about 200 people die each year, 500-600 if you dig into it, max estimate is that up to 50 000 die each year because of a result of exposure to substances at work

At one point the programme interviews an accountant called John who worked for a local authority and who illeagally siphoned £360 000 from client’s accounts over a four year period. This amount barely registers compared to other Frauds, but £360 000 would make the top ten list of amounts stolen in face to face robberies.  

Mark Levi assesses the amount of damage done by fraud – (despite the obvious problems) – a conservative estimate was that it costs the UK economy £11.5 billion – £20 billion if one includes income tax fraud -2005 figures.

Former senior police officers who worked on White Collar Crime – argue that unreported white collar crime represents a ‘serious economic attack on the country’

A city insider argues that systemic fraud is built into the very structure of a market place (think big city stock broking firms.) He argues that many at the top of these companies are fuelled on cocaine and  points out that you only reach these organisations by being dominating – and once you get to the top, you will do what is necessary to stay there – if Fraud is necessary you will commit Fraud.

He argues that city types justify their crimes by talking of ‘being in a war’ with other companies, or being in ‘a battle of survival’ he also argues that they talk in aggressive macho language – when taking over other companies – ‘ we’ve got to bust or rape that company’

 

 

Point 2 – White Collar and Corporate Crimes have a very low prosecution and clear up rate

Q – The clear up rate – the proportion of detected fraud is 5% – why so low???

Reason 1 – While the opportunities for fraud have increased exponentially because of the growth of the internet. You don’t have to look far to witness them – the Nigerian Government fraud squads have been stripped and declined over the last ten to fifteen years

Reason 2 – Garry Slapper – argues these agencies are too under resourced to actually regulate let alone prosecute –  there is 1 building inspector for every 3000 building sites

Reason 3 – There is also a culture of negligence towards crime and fraud prevention – The Financial Services Authority or the Health and Safety Authority (who are the bodies who prosecute corporate and financial criminals) do not see the same moral compulsion to prosecute as ordinary Police Officers tackling Gun Crime.

70% of deaths at work are caused by violation of law – the average fine for a worker death is about  £50 000 even where you cans show where the director of a company is responsible

Record Health and Safety fine was in Runcorn in the NW against ICI – due to a mercury leek – £300 000 fine, -0.1% of profit for that year.

HSE –46% decline in Health and Safety Prosecutions over the last 6 years, even though the number of deaths and accidents have remained roughly the same.

Very complex array of agencies – and it is easy to defend against, also used to

Corporate Manslaughter act (2008) should make this easier.